On Mon, 17 Sep 2001 05:40, Michael McKibben wrote: > I've attached a patch for CLArgsParser and ClutilTestCase which adds the > requested feature.
committed - taah! > In trying to be consistent with getArguments(), I added > two new methods: getArgumentById(int) and getArgumentByName(String). In > retrospect, should they be renamed getOptions(), and getOptionByXXX since > they return CLOption? Not sure - it prolly does make more sense using "option" - what does everyone else think? > The patched ClutilTestCase adds a test case for > validating the two new methods. I created the patches using cvs diff -u > relative to the project root directory. yay! -- Cheers, Pete *-----------------------------------------------------* | Never argue with an idiot, they'll drag you down to | | their level, and beat you with experience | *-----------------------------------------------------* --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
