there is a wide gap between the documented english writen contract of  the ComponentManager and ComponentSelctor and its implementation - the implementation is much wider.
 the writen contract is only one possible way of using the classes.
when i wrote the unit tests i faced this problem.
which contract should i check?
1-the english one.
2-the code.
option 1 makes the unit test more helpfull for peaople who wants to learn how the code was
meant to be used. -part of the documentation.
what is the real contract of the classes?
this time i checked the code contract- option 2 ,but im not sure ...
 
...
ran
 

Attachment: DefaultComponentSelectorTestCase.java
Description: Binary data

Attachment: DefaultComponentManagerTestCase.java
Description: Binary data

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to