Hi Donald, >Hi, > >Whats everyone think about renaming server.xml to environment.xml ? It has >been requested by a few (2) users and it kinda makes sense. The file >describes environmental information and thus environment.xml makes sense. It >also starts to get away from the notion that Phoenix is solely for serverside >work. > >One of my initial goals for Phoenix was to enable it to scale from small >computers on tanks to your large mainframes and I also wanted it to be able >to be hostable in a GUI app. At the moment it is not really possible due to >overhead of threads and ClassLoader stuff. However this will gradually change >over time. > >Anyways it would make more sense to rename the file to emphasize its purpose >(it setting up environment) and to support notion that Phoenix is not just >for serverside apps. That are exactly my thoughts about phoenix, when I get involved. Server.xml is a little bit misleadingly. So you get my first shy +1 for this proposal...
So long Gerhard -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
