Chad Stansbury wrote:
I think it is important to distinguish between profiling and
*instrumenting*. The discussion being held up to this point is really about
instrumenting the code - so the Profilable interface is, IMO, a bit of a
misnomer. I think it should be renamed Instrumentable.
Thoughts?
It makes sense. The name Profiler, et. al. was derived from the SEDA
architecture,
and the mistaken nomencature was passed on. Once we get to an arrangement for
the
architecture that we like, we can start changing the names.
But you are correct, this is *instrumenting* the code.
--
"They that give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety
deserve neither liberty nor safety."
- Benjamin Franklin
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
