Peter Donald wrote: > >> (1) if the test failures represents a real problem that somebody intends >> to fix soonish. In which case, I will let the nagging continue. >> >> (2) the test failures are not important at this time, so I will simply >> adjust the target that Gump runs to one that doesn't include these >> tests. >> >> (3) something needs to be corrected with the Gump setup > > (3) ! ;)
Found it. Fixed. The problem is that the builds don't FAIL exactly, the tests deadlock and hang. Eventually, Gump times out, reports this as a failure on the web site, but doesn't generate an e-mail to this mailing list. Expect to start seeing nags. I've modified the subject line so you can distinguish between these two cases without even opening the e-mail. In the next few days, let me know which of the three items above still apply. Thanks! - Sam Ruby -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
