on 2/23/01 2:13 PM, "Federico Barbieri" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I guess it's not the standard procedure but I really don't care about > all the cvs history. One of the reason is that with the split history > became quite meaningless. Avalon as it was a year ago is so different > from jakarta-avalon that it makes more sense to me to just use releases > as historical db. > > what's so wrong with this? > > Fede The world is MUCH larger than just what you happen to care about Fede. The fact of the matter is that other people might care about it. You are doing open development and you have absolutely no clue as to who else might be depending on your software. By screwing up the history on the files, you might as well just change methods without deprecating them as well....because who cares? You certainly don't. One of the primary purposes of CVS is to keep a history of changes on files. How can you simply ignore that? -jon
