On Thursday 18 July 2002 07:58 pm, Peter Donald wrote: > Would you be able to look at implementing merging via a different > mechanism. The way you have done it is to have each node do a merge on > access. This is painful to debug in my experience and I would prefer to > separate out different features into different layers. Would it be possible > to add in > > DefaultConfiguration config = ConfigMerger.merge( arent, supplied ); > > That way we could debug merging and usage at separate times and makes it > much easier to use. > > Like?
Sure! I contemplated that as I was reading the prior threads on CascadingConfiguration. The only reason I didn't do so was that I started modifying the CascadingConfiguration and went from there. I was going to implement the key-attribute bits tommorow to support merging children with the same getName(), so I'll make the changes then. Also need to read up on JMX... thankfully there are free book chapters @ theserverside.com :) -pete -- peter royal -> [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
