> From: Peter Donald [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> 
> Hi,
> 
> It seems that the JMX RI does not support ModelMBeans well 
> and the work 
> that Huw has been doing on JMX recently requires such 
> support. We have been 
> talking about removing RI support for a while now and I was 
> wondering if 
> anyone objects to that?
> 
> Its effect would be the removal of the rmiadaptor (MX4j 
> already has a RMI 
> Adaptor) and DefaultManager (which hooks into RI directly).
> 
> MX4j does everything we need anyways so what say you ?

We can still use JMX?

I need to expose a JMX interface for something--need some pointers
on how to get started...  But I want to make sure it isn't going
away.


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Reply via email to