On Tue, 13 Aug 2002 15:35, Paul Hammant wrote: > Huw, Peter, Folks, > > I have to say I dislike the MBean suffix for JMX enabled beans. In fact > it is my principle objection to JMX (yes I know it is anal).
JMX does not require it - its just convention. What do you object to exactly - a separate interface or just the suffix. You can quite easily name the interface anything you want and phoenix will handle it gracefully. If it is the interface itselfyou don't like then it would seem I am the only one that likes em ;) > Would it be possible to generate them? yep. I believe many projects do. -- Cheers, Peter Donald ----------------------------------------------- | If you turn on the light quickly enough, | | you can see what the dark looks like. | ----------------------------------------------- -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
