On Thu, 5 Sep 2002 14:19, Eung-ju Park wrote: > Current MX4JSystemManager configuration is not flexible.
true - nor was it compatible with our old configuration format. I just fixed that ;) > I don't know about JMX. But I think below form of configuration brings more > power to SystemManager. > JBoss's configuration has similar form. looks interesting. It is less "configuration" and more a script that can be executed on the MBean server. It could be interesting to do it this way. However I think we should also support our old configuration format. Some options so that we can use this would be to either; 1. create a new ScriptableMx4jSystemManager 2. Allow a subelement <script/> that we could use to "execute" script I think I prefer (1) as it is the easiest to maintain. Thoughts? -- Cheers, Peter Donald *------------------------------------------------* | Trying is the first step to failure. | | So never try, Lisa - Homer Jay Simpson | *------------------------------------------------* -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
