Daniel Krieg wrote: > > I think we need a better specification for Sevak. What is its purpose? How > should it interoperate with other apps. Is it simply about embedding an > existing Servlet Container within Phoenix or is it about creating an > abstract container that can utilize implementations of existing containers?
I think the second option is more useful. I don't see any compelling advantage in running Catalina under Phoenix vs. stand-alone. Whether Sevak should be an abstract container with many possible implementations or whether it should be a Catalina-specific container is not that important to me. If any features were lost when going abstract, I'd recommend staying close to Catalina. I don't think it is necessary to have several servlet engines under Phoenix, it would be enough to have just one, if that one works and allows for easy integration of Servlets with Phoenix apps. If other servlet engines were needed in the future, then another container similar to Sevak could be written. If, however, it is possible to go abstract without losing any features or ease of use, then that would be the way to go. Ulrich -- Ulrich Mayring DENIC eG, Systementwicklung -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
