Peter Donald wrote: > On Mon, 14 Oct 2002 21:43, Ulrich Mayring wrote: > >>However, why not include it in Phoenix? It would be >>a sorry server framework without it :) > > > Maybe in the future. However for the moment I would prefer to focu on shipping > the minimal set of jars we need. In the future when I finally fix our > classLoader so that it does everything we need. Then we can look at other > options ;)
To me it doesn't matter much one way or the other. Now that I know it isn't included I just do so myself. But new users downloading Phoenix will certainly not know about it and they will say: "What a sorry server framework, it doesn't even provide Database support." ;-) Ulrich -- Ulrich Mayring DENIC eG, Systementwicklung -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
