Peter Donald wrote:
There are two mistakes you have made here Pete:On Mon, 18 Nov 2002 20:17, Ulrich Mayring wrote:Regardless, what you describe seem to be interpersonal problems betweenBecause those same individuals have vote and commit privlidges on phoenix. And thus people who have never participated in the development of Phoenix can block changes in phoenix if it conflicts or competes with their pet toolkit (this has happened in the past and will happen again if we stay). Progressing to a TLP essentially removes that risk.
certain individuals. Would you mind explaining precisely why a promotion
of Phoenix to a TLP would solve these socially motivated problems?
1. I have contributed to Phoneix during its early days, locating
and reporting bugs, documentation and end-user support (back
when there were lots of problems and the comunity was small).
2. Objections that I have raised have been in relation to the
overarching issue of avoiding inconsitencies and
incompatabilities related to concurrent containerment
solutions.
The problems that have occured arrose when we didn't agree on approaches concerning component assembly, configuration and context management, and more recently - meta. You made it clear that the approaches I was putting forward at the time would *never* make it into Phoenix (or any other project you consider to be under your control). You reinforced that point of view with sustained -1, ensuring my exclusion. Following this, you chose to proceed on a path of character assasination.
Well, what can I say, ... keep up the good work?
:-)
Cheers, Steve.
--
Stephen J. McConnell
OSM SARL
digital products for a global economy
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.osm.net
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
