Cryptic sounds negative... ;) > -----Urspr�ngliche Nachricht----- > Von: Paul Hammant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Gesendet: Samstag, 30. M�rz 2002 07:41 > An: Avalon-Phoenix Developers List > Betreff: Re: AW: Statusable > > > Eung-ju, > > Sorry dude. I knew your were trading behind some cryptic > email address. > It was 'colus' of course. > > - Paul > > >Emperor is not me. ;-) > > > >----- Original Message ----- > >From: "Paul Hammant" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >To: "Avalon-Phoenix Developers List" > ><[email protected]> > >Sent: Friday, March 29, 2002 9:30 PM > >Subject: Re: AW: Statusable > > > > > >>Eung-Ju, > >> > >>Yes that would work, but the secondary need would be to > buffer things > >>for repeated use in a management app. > >> > >>Maybe I'll just keep using System.out :-) It is not a problem ... > >> > >>- Paul > >> > >>>Why not use a separate Logger to output to console? So the newbies > >>>wouldn't have to do anything, and you could easily disable console > >>>logging or redirect it to a file. > >>> > >>>>-----Urspr�ngliche Nachricht----- > >>>>Von: Leo Simons [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>>>Gesendet: Donnerstag, 28. M�rz 2002 21:37 > >>>>An: Avalon-Phoenix Developers List > >>>>Betreff: RE: Statusable > >>>> > >>>> > >>>>I'm +1 but as this would break logger binary compatibility it > >>>>requires a new release of logger, and maybe also of excalibur/ > >>>>framework (not exactly sure where the changes are neccessary?). > >>>> > >>>>So we might still need to keep writing to System.out for > now... you > >>>>volunteering to look into this? ;) > >>>> > >>>>Also, did Pete ever reply to the question below? Pete? He is > >>>>king-of-the-logkit of course, so we need his infinite > wisdom on this > >>>>:P > >>>> > >>>>cheers, > >>>> > >>>>- Leo > >>>> > >>>>>-----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > >>>>>Van: Paul Hammant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>>>>Verzonden: Thursday, March 28, 2002 9:05 PM > >>>>>Aan: Avalon-Phoenix Developers List > >>>>>Onderwerp: Re: Statusable > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>>I think this is worth re-opening. > >>>>> > >>>>>Reason? Well we are about to have SAR files > downloadable from the > >>>>>website and drop into an arbitary Phoneix. In terms of > the "five > >>>>>second test", it would be handy if the blocks could offer > >>>>> > >>>>some advice > >>>> > >>>>>after start(). > >>>>> > >>>>>For example if a product uses Jo! it may want to say. > >>>>> > >>>>> "HTTP Service mounted on port 8080" > >>>>> > >>>>>At the moment I find myself writing to System.out to help > >>>>> > >>>>the newbie > >>>> > >>>>>know what they should do after launching Phoenix with an > app. It > >>>>>would be nice if there were some controlled way of output > >>>>> > >>>>such status > >>>> > >>>>>info for a block. > >>>>> > >>>>>The original idea was to have Statusable > >>>>> > > > >>>>setStatus(String msg) ], > >>>> > >>>>>but that was rightly shot down as there is much overlap > >>>>> > >>>>with Logger. > >>>> > >>>>>If Logger were to have a new method for setting of status (or > >>>>>priority) and the status, as well as being output to the > >>>>> > >>>>log target, > >>>> > >>>>>were buffered by Phoenix for other use : > >>>>> > >>>>> 1) later retrieval by a management console, webapp or GUI. > >>>>> 2) after system startup, a once only outputting of > statii to the > >>>>>console (for the newbie) > >>>>> > >>>>>Thoughts? > >>>>> > >>>>>- Paul > >>>>> > >>>>>>Hi, > >>>>>> > >>>>>>>Emperor is making the same point about similarities with > >>>>>>> > >>>>Logging. I > >>>> > >>>>>>>am not so sure there is that overlap with the current > >>>>>>> > >>>>Logger.class. > >>>> > >>>>>>>If it had status(String st); as a method I might think it > >>>>>>> > >>>>could do > >>>> > >>>>>>>the job. I am not sure how we would stand on that > addition given > >>>>>>>the recent backwards-compatability flamewars ;-) > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>How about extending the Priority by adding a STATUS > level and do > >>>>>>logger.log(XXXPriority.STATUS, message)? True, Priority is final > >>>>>> > >>>>>but I don't > >>>>> > >>>>>>see any reason why it is like that. Why would you use > >>>>>> > >>>>>logger.log(..) method > >>>>> > >>>>>>then? > >>>>>> > >>>>>>Mircea > >>>>>> > >>>>>>-- > >>>>>>To unsubscribe, e-mail: > >>>>>> > >>>><mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >>>> > >>>>>For additional commands, e-mail: > >>>>> > >>>><mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >>>> > >>>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>>-- > >>>>To unsubscribe, e-mail: > >>>><mailto:avalon-phoenix-dev-> [EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >>>> > >>>>For additional commands, > >>>>e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>>-- > >>>>To unsubscribe, e-mail: > >>>><mailto:avalon-phoenix-dev-> [EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >>>> > >>>>For additional commands, > >>>>e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >>>> > >>>> > >>> > >>>-- > >>>To unsubscribe, e-mail: > >>> > ><mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > >>>For additional commands, e-mail: > >>> > ><mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > >>> > >>> > >> > >> > >> > >>-- > >>To unsubscribe, e-mail: > >> > ><mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > >>For additional commands, e-mail: > >> > ><mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > >> > > > > > >-- > >To unsubscribe, e-mail: > <mailto:avalon-phoenix-dev-> [EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > >For additional commands, > e-mail: > ><mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > > > > > > > -- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > <mailto:avalon-phoenix-dev-> [EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > For additional commands, > e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >
-- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
