On Tue, 2002-12-03 at 11:43, Sam Ruby wrote: > Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote: > > > Avalon has still in minds of many a bad name about the heavy > > refactorings it did years ago. Avalon is stable, works well, but still > > developers remember what happened back then. I don't want this to repeat. > > Avalon is stable?
yup, a lot of the stuff in the avalon project is, even if we don't always follow XP practices too closely and we sometimes have nightly builds failing for a few days in a row. > Things like the following indicate otherwise: > > http://cvs.apache.org/builds/gump/2002-12-02/jakarta-avalon-phoenix.html Pete's historically been the one to handle gump; he can't now for obvious reasons. This is on my TODO. It's just that the community stuff is way more important atm and stuff like this suffers a little as a result ;) cheers, - Leo -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
