On Wed, 4 Dec 2002 01:29, Berin Loritsch wrote: > > From: Peter Donald [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > On Wed, 4 Dec 2002 00:28, Berin Loritsch wrote: > > > Truth be told, the best we can do with Avalon's context is define > > > standards for what information gets bound in there. That will be > > > the Avalon context. There are other application specific components > > > that follow a different model from Avalon--examples include EJBs, > > > Servlets, and Axis components (web services). Each of those need > > > a container for their components that is domain specific. The new > > > container needs to be extensible enough to satisfy them. > > > > Do I get to say I told you so yet ? ;) > > No, because history shows that you introduced Context.
Not quite - Context was here before I got here. I believe it predates ComponentManager which was split out from it. -- Cheers, Peter Donald *------------------------------------------------* | Those who know how to think need no teachers. | | - Gandhi | *------------------------------------------------* -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
