> -----Original Message----- > From: Berin Loritsch [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: den 4 december 2002 18:10 > To: 'Avalon Developers List' > Subject: Avalon voting process > > > I propose that we follow the voting process outlined > by Incubator. It is standard across all the projects > I have seen. It addresses voting process of the community > at large, but does not address the voting process of > the PMC.
+1 > I still have yet to see other charters besides the XML > one, and voting guidelines do not constitute a charter. > I suggest that changes to the charter and voting guidelines > be treated as code changes, with the stipulation that only > PMC votes are binding. That allows a PMC member to veto > a change with proper justification. Proper justification > should also have a counter-proposal so that the rest of the > PMC knows *how* to rectify the situation. +1 I sent in a couple of questions and suggestions in: http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=avalon-apps-dev&m=103900145220413&w=2 > Regarding Avalon membership, we should follow the Apache > bylaws Article IV (4). Membership meaning committers, and > PMC. +1, though this in some points conflict with the proposed charter (for example, in the bylaws 2/3 majority is enough to kick someone out, in the charter it is unanimous). > In regards to the definition of Quorum, we should follow > the Apache bylaws Article III (3) Section 3.9. +1 > Are we on board with this? Almost. /LS -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
