On Sat, 2002-06-22 at 05:01, Leo Simons wrote: > all, > > recent, rather heated discussion regarding the future of avalon between > its developers have raised concerns with some users of the current > avalon regarding its stability and usability. > > let's clear this up. > > Avalon is one of the best frameworks for general and server-side > software development available. It's developers think it is *the* best > one, certainly for the java language. As such, it is in daily use in > several other open source projects, as well as closed source onces. > > Uses of avalon range from desktop management software to full-blown > CORBA EAI solutions, and in between there's everything from web > publishing frameworks to mail servers, CRM solutions and advanced gaming > engines. > > In all these projects, using avalon has turned out to be a good and > addictive choice. > > The avalon developers recognize their responsibilities toward these > projects and the need to have a stable, consistent, backwards compatible > API to program to. This will not change. > > Partly because of the extremely long incubation period avalon and its > various components have enjoyed, the very first avalon pieces to be > declared of "final release" quality, avalon framework and excalibur 4.0, > have seen only minimal outwardly visible changes since that release. > > We will strive to keep such changes minimal in all future avalon > releases. Where we do feel that outwardly visible changes are necessary, > we will identify why these changes are needed, what their benefits are, > how it affects your software, and what would be a good migration path. > We will also make sure to provide backwards-compatibility. > > I hope this message takes away a lot of unnecessary uncertainty and > doubt.
After playing with Avalon for only a week or two I have to say it's pretty cool. I have got a full prototype working and I've received all the help I've needed from the avalon developers in order to get my little container going. I was originally one of the biggest skeptics of Avalon and it's taken over a year since I first looked at Avalon to decide that Turbine would make the switch. I wish now that I wasn't so stubborn and wish I had tried it a lot sooner. So I encourage anyone looking at Avalon to give it try because it worked pretty much right off the hop for me and there are plenty of examples in the test cases and the documentation. I'm a happy client :-) > best regards, > > - Leo Simons > > > -- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- jvz. Jason van Zyl [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://tambora.zenplex.org In short, man creates for himself a new religion of a rational and technical order to justify his work and to be justified in it. -- Jacques Ellul, The Technological Society -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
