--- Paul Hammant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > jaaron, > [..snip..] > It was more about Tomcat that Avalon, but yes it is true. Avalon > (Phoenix) was the microkernel that came first. Our grand plan road-map > has always been to assimilate just about every port listening service. > > JBoss is about 100 time better known that Avalon (or any subproject) > now. Fact of life. >
I really like JBoss, in fact I run it on my personal servers and I use it for development at work. However, for my last two major projects, I've gone with developing around Avalon instead of JBoss, even though JBoss was definitely an option. I think the Avalon projects are more flexible and more powerful and I would really like to see it grow. Besides, there's more than enough room for both projects. > >That said, JBoss from the start was to be a J2EE application server, while > >Avalon is more a framework for servers. I think it would be more accurate > to > >say that Pheonix and JBoss have similiarities. > > > >Speaking of JBoss, has anyone ever gotten any of the JBoss MBeans to run > within > >Pheonix? I say this knowing very little about Pheonix, but I think it > should > >be possible to modify them or put a wrapper around them in some way. > Wouldn't > >this give a whole new set of blocks for use within Pheonix? > > > That and Phoenix services inside JBoss are being looked at. > > - PAul Are these projects being handled by Avalon/Pheonix people or JBoss people or both? Anything in a CVS repository yet? jaaron __________________________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now. http://mailplus.yahoo.com -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
