As Ed wrote: > I sorry to be such a pain but, here are two more problems with the > last patch file called: "avarice-2.10_atxmega256a3_support.patch".
Given my explanation about the current deficiencies of Xmega debugging, are you sure you even *want* to apply that patch at all? > It seems that somewhere in this mess is an extra curly brace, or one > missing and I don't understand this file format so I cannot discern > where exactly the problem lies. It's a struct initialization, but one of your previous patches added more elements to this struct type. The Xmega256a3 patch doesn't know about this addition, so it's got the wrong number of fields in it. -- cheers, J"org .-.-. --... ...-- -.. . DL8DTL http://www.sax.de/~joerg/ NIC: JW11-RIPE Never trust an operating system you don't have sources for. ;-) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Colocation vs. Managed Hosting A question and answer guide to determining the best fit for your organization - today and in the future. http://p.sf.net/sfu/internap-sfd2d _______________________________________________ avarice-user mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/avarice-user
