Hi Knut,

> as promised here is my next trace.

Thank you very much!  As you might have noticed, I already uploaded
your trace data to your feature request, so all of them can be
accessed from there.

> Sorry for the long delay - but a lot 
> of work, > 2 weeks ill and Christmas limits the free amount of time.

Same here (only my sickness was a little shorter ;), so no problem.

I have been looking at your data, however:

> Record           Action
> 153xx            Change EEProm adr: 0x180 from 0xff to 0x55
> 178xx            Press Run
> 18xxx            Enter breakpoint  and press F5 (Continue)
> 200xx            Press "Break all" (Ctrl+F5)
> 228xx            Change RAM 0x362f from 0 to 0xffff
> 254xx            Add Breakpoint 5
> 290xx            Set new Statement (PC from 0x9178 to 0x9173
> 301xx            Single Step (F11)
> 329xx            Stop Debugging (Ctrl+Shift+F5)

There appears to be one problem.  The record numbers you show are
probably those before filtering out the dataless frames.  So, in the
trace you uploaded, all record numbers are different, alas (the entire
trace has only 1482 records now anymore).

Could you somehow re-match the above numbers to either the record
numbers in the filtered stream, or to some approximate wall-clodk
time?
-- 
cheers, J"org               .-.-.   --... ...--   -.. .  DL8DTL

http://www.sax.de/~joerg/                        NIC: JW11-RIPE
Never trust an operating system you don't have sources for. ;-)

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Master Visual Studio, SharePoint, SQL, ASP.NET, C# 2012, HTML5, CSS,
MVC, Windows 8 Apps, JavaScript and much more. Keep your skills current
with LearnDevNow - 3,200 step-by-step video tutorials by Microsoft
MVPs and experts. ON SALE this month only -- learn more at:
http://p.sf.net/sfu/learnmore_122712
_______________________________________________
avarice-user mailing list
avarice-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/avarice-user

Reply via email to