Hi Knut, > as promised here is my next trace.
Thank you very much! As you might have noticed, I already uploaded your trace data to your feature request, so all of them can be accessed from there. > Sorry for the long delay - but a lot > of work, > 2 weeks ill and Christmas limits the free amount of time. Same here (only my sickness was a little shorter ;), so no problem. I have been looking at your data, however: > Record Action > 153xx Change EEProm adr: 0x180 from 0xff to 0x55 > 178xx Press Run > 18xxx Enter breakpoint and press F5 (Continue) > 200xx Press "Break all" (Ctrl+F5) > 228xx Change RAM 0x362f from 0 to 0xffff > 254xx Add Breakpoint 5 > 290xx Set new Statement (PC from 0x9178 to 0x9173 > 301xx Single Step (F11) > 329xx Stop Debugging (Ctrl+Shift+F5) There appears to be one problem. The record numbers you show are probably those before filtering out the dataless frames. So, in the trace you uploaded, all record numbers are different, alas (the entire trace has only 1482 records now anymore). Could you somehow re-match the above numbers to either the record numbers in the filtered stream, or to some approximate wall-clodk time? -- cheers, J"org .-.-. --... ...-- -.. . DL8DTL http://www.sax.de/~joerg/ NIC: JW11-RIPE Never trust an operating system you don't have sources for. ;-) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Master Visual Studio, SharePoint, SQL, ASP.NET, C# 2012, HTML5, CSS, MVC, Windows 8 Apps, JavaScript and much more. Keep your skills current with LearnDevNow - 3,200 step-by-step video tutorials by Microsoft MVPs and experts. ON SALE this month only -- learn more at: http://p.sf.net/sfu/learnmore_122712 _______________________________________________ avarice-user mailing list avarice-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/avarice-user