As Andreas Løhre wrote: > The full output is:
An interesting list, thanks! > [jtag2rw.cc:180]: (error) Memory leak: response > [jtag3rw.cc:182]: (error) Memory leak: response Both these are actually the same (with the jtag3 code being cloned from the jtag2 implementation). All this looks confusing, and I have to think about it again (there's a usage of "resp" versus "response" inside these functions). > [jtag2usb.cc:422]: (error) Mismatching allocation and deallocation: > devnamecopy Created as an array, but deleted as a non-array. Fixed. > [jtag2usb.cc:302]: (error) Memory leak: devnamecopy Yes, in cas of an error; fixed. > [jtag3io.cc:495]: (error) Array 'cmd[4]' accessed at index 4, which is out > of bounds As you've guessed, 0, 1, 2, 3 is the correct sequence. Besides accessing the array out of bounds, the bug lead to the request for applying an external reset (throgh nSRST) not being obeyed at all. Fixed. I'm afraid the next step would be to strace both invocations, and see what is done differently in the version as compiled by GCC 4.7. -- cheers, J"org .-.-. --... ...-- -.. . DL8DTL http://www.sax.de/~joerg/ NIC: JW11-RIPE Never trust an operating system you don't have sources for. ;-) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Master Visual Studio, SharePoint, SQL, ASP.NET, C# 2012, HTML5, CSS, MVC, Windows 8 Apps, JavaScript and much more. Keep your skills current with LearnDevNow - 3,200 step-by-step video tutorials by Microsoft MVPs and experts. ON SALE this month only -- learn more at: http://p.sf.net/sfu/learnmore_122712 _______________________________________________ avarice-user mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/avarice-user
