> On Tue, May 15, 2001 at 01:00:50PM -0400, safemode wrote:
> > Just wondering why there isn't a benchmark utility in the cvs dist
> > of avifile. Compiling the "stable" version is exceedingly difficult
> > when using newer versions of sdl and it would be nice to see
> > what kind of differences are made performance wise in the
> > cvs due to certain source changes. Or perhaps i'm looking
> > in the wrong place. Is there a benchmark utility for 0.6?
>
> well I found one in samples/... maybe you don't have qt2
> and it doesn't build.
No, i just like to email before really checking. Heh, i found it in
samples/misc
So, What's some marks for 0.6 Somehow i think that the last
result given for 0.5.x where the Avg. video output was said to be 865GB/s
was a little wrong given that the bus bandwidth for agp is only a few GB/s
if that. Sounds like a compiler error.
I got this.
Stream 0: 73646976:33766964, 216241 chunks
Cache: Adding stream 0, 216241 chunks
Stream 1: 73647561:0, 155357 chunks
Cache: Adding stream 1, 155357 chunks
Cache: Creating cache for file descriptor: 4
Successfully initialized stream 0
Chunk table size 216241, format size 40
Successfully initialized stream 1
Chunk table size 155366, format size 28
Successfully opened /home/ftp/pub/movies/Crouching_Tiger_Hidden_Dragon.avi. 1
video streams, 1 audio streams
Length 216241
Initializing registry
Using DirectShow codec: /usr/lib/win32/divx_c32.ax
Decoder is capable of YUV output ( flags 0x1 )
Movie size: 640x512
Played 80 frames in 2.116112 seconds ( max frame rate 37.805178 fps )
Average results:
Decompression 11.314958 ms
Drawing 4.147512 ms
Sync 10.988933 ms
Average video output speed: 59.638183 Mb/s
Total Unfree 2879526 bytes cnt 85 [0,0]
Destroying cache. Total accesses 112, hits 100.00%, misses 0.00%, errors 0.00%
_______________________________________________
Avifile mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://prak.org/mailman/listinfo/avifile
