I notice virtually no difference from i586 to i686. Is there really a difference? If so how much? I have a p3 866 / 512MB ram. Message: 1 From: root <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sun, 20 May 2001 16:14:13 +0200 Subject: [Avifile]Compilation fails Dear list, I am new to this list and have a problem when compailing avifile libs. I disabled QT utilities because I don't need them, I guess. Now here's the output I got: /usr/include/g++/stl_algobase.h: In function `static _Tp * __copy_backward_dispatch<const _Tp *,_Tp *,__true_type>::copy(const _Tp *, const _Tp *, _Tp *)': /usr/include/g++/stl_algobase.h:281: type/value mismatch at argument 3 in template parameter list for `template <class _BidirectionalIter1, class _BidirectionalIter2, class _BoolType> __copy_backward_dispatch<_BidirectionalIter1,_BidirectionalIter2,_BoolType>' /usr/include/g++/stl_algobase.h:281: expected a type, got `__trug_type' make[3]: *** [allocator.lo] Error 1 make[3]: Leaving directory `/root/avifile-0.53.5/lib/videocodec/DirectShow' make[2]: *** [install-recursive] Error 1 make[2]: Leaving directory `/root/avifile-0.53.5/lib/videocodec' make[1]: *** [install-recursive] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/root/avifile-0.53.5/lib' make: *** [install-recursive] Error 1 bash-2.04# gcc -v Reading specs from /usr/lib/gcc-lib/i486-suse-linux/2.95.2/specs gcc version 2.95.2 19991024 (release) As you can see, my gcc fits the requirements. Please help me. Sincerly, Sascha Kloss --__--__-- Message: 2 From: Jukka Tastula <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sun, 20 May 2001 20:47:38 +0300 boundary="------------Boundary-00=_ERANJ4WBJ6LN5N4PIAGY" Subject: [Avifile]about optimization --------------Boundary-00=_ERANJ4WBJ6LN5N4PIAGY Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Now that 0.6 finally compiles on 3.3.6 without hacking, I'm thinking why not change the -march=i586 flag to -march=i686 when appropriate? The performance difference seems to be somewhat noticable and I believe most of us are running it on i686 anyway. Something that resembles a patch below in case someone's feeling too tired :) _______________________________________________ Avifile mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://prak.org/mailman/listinfo/avifile
