On Wed, Oct 03, 2001 at 05:07:21PM +0200, Guillaume Rousse wrote:
> Ainsi parlait Zdenek Kabelac :
> > could you build you packages for  i586 architecture ?
> > There is no 'reasonable' gain in speed (of course unless you are
> > from Mplayer team where they are counting with each nop cycle...)
> > and you make a portable package which could be used by both
> > athlons & intel users.
> But i do build for i586 :-) rpm doesn't source configuration for this trivial 
> macro evaluation, where it does for building.
> [guillaume@silbermann guillaume]$ cat .rpmrc
> buildarchtranslate: i386: i586
> buildarchtranslate: i486: i586
> buildarchtranslate: i586: i586
> buildarchtranslate: i686: i586
> Just a question: what is the default option of --enable-x86opt ? If true, 
> does this means specific platform optimisation (3DNow) are used ?

use_x86opt=yes

well as I said we are not CPU cycle hunters - so we are currently not 
using such extended instruction sets - unless they are used by
specific codec - there is also problem - where would you want to use
this optimalization ? - library itself it quite cpu unintensive task....



-- 
  .''`.  Which fundamental human right do you want to give up today?
 : :' :      Debian GNU/Linux maintainer - www.debian.{org,cz}
 `. `'  Zdenek Kabelac  kabi@{debian.org, users.sf.net, fi.muni.cz}
   `-         Resistance is futile. You all will be packaged

_______________________________________________
Avifile mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://prak.org/mailman/listinfo/avifile

Reply via email to