Ainsi parlait Zdenek Kabelac : > > You asked me the same question yesterday about lame :-) > > Sure, win32 loader has nothing illegal, it's just useless without > > win32dll, which are illegal to distribute. Providing them in a distinct > > subpackage allow to add a dependance for win32 package, ensuring propre > > auto-installation with urpmi tool. > > So I'll give you same answer as for lame :-) > Again - there is no reason to push user to use your package with codecs - > he might just want to donwload tar.gz set and use this set instead > of your package (btw - is there somethink like Suggest: in Debian - > e.g. you could suggest such package but user doesn't have to install > it and he doesn't have to 'fight' with forced dependencies) Unfortunatly, there isn't any suggest equivalent in rpm world :-( The behaviour you're describing here (someone who prefers using manually-installed software instead of packaged) is for experimented user, someone who should also knows about the --nodeps flags for rpm installation. As long as it doesn't make other users life impossible, I prefer to make newbie life easier :-) -- Guillaume Rousse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> GPG key http://lis.snv.jussieu.fr/~rousse/gpgkey.html
_______________________________________________ Avifile mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://prak.org/mailman/listinfo/avifile
