Hi, > ZK> You are using DivX4 dll (you might preferer linux native code - but > ZK> the latest Win32 DivX4.12 is faster and there is not yet > ZK> equvalent of this code for linux (Euegene - is there a reason - e.g. > ZK> Intel doesn't want this ??) > > Because current divx4 code is compilable only with Intel C++ compiler
Why don't you compile it with intel cc for linux then? I got 10-25% performance boost compared to gcc anyway, on libavcodec. > for Windows. Why do you think it's faster than last native Linux > release? Btw, what about XviD ? Its authors say it's better in quality and speed than divx4. We've made few tests, but it's hard to make difference. Sometimes divx4 seems to be better sometimes xvid. I think it's just difference of few internal constants? A'rpi / Astral & ESP-team -- mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://esp-team.scene.hu _______________________________________________ Avifile mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://prak.org/mailman/listinfo/avifile
