Hi,
On Thursday 20 March 2003 12:35, Zdenek Kabelac wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 20, 2003 at 09:48:11AM +0100, Alexander Rawass wrote:
> >
> > And anyway - Avicap was the first recording program that worked *fine*
> > for me - no framedrops, nearly no A/V-sync problems, only 70-80% CPU
> > usage when recording with DivX - great!
>
> I guess there are number of people who would explain you how is
> the mencoder the best ever-made tool for TV recording.
For re-encoding and playing, I'd also swear on mencoder/mplayer.
But capturing from TV resulted with a serious A/V-Delay, when I tried it some
time ago - and it hasn't got a GUI, which is important for me (but maybe not
for others)
> And then there is the next group with nvrec - and currentlu
I also didn't get nvrec running, sadly.
> I've not time to 'fight' in this battle field.
I think there shouldn't be a battle field, or a fight at all.
We should learn and respect that some people have these preferences and tend
to use application A, and people with other preferences might prefer
application B, but there's no need to say or to deduce that A might be better
than B or else :-)
But what I want to say is just: Avicap works extremely fine _for_me_ - other
people's opinions and solutions are fine, too :-)
> > Did you read my posting about suggestions on Avicap, and on the
> > possibility of a fullscreen/maximize implementation?
>
> Well actually I've been thinking about this for quite some time -
> maybe when I get faster CPU I'll play a bit with this
> (and of course reasonable amount of free time for this)
Yes, I know this problem - too many ideas, not enough time :-))
Fullscreen can wait for a moment ;-)
Alex
--
Alexander Rawass
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://tuxfleet.sourceforge.net http://qtreemap.sourceforge.net
...but some day you'll be a STAR in somebody else's SKY...
_______________________________________________
Avifile mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://prak.org/mailman/listinfo/avifile
