... >> So let me change my question: >> >> I've been assuming params.get() is the only params-related API we >> *want* (or plan) to expose to test writers. Is that correct? >> > > That's correct. > > And that's why I kept bringing back the discussion about params.iteritems(). >
Actually we were asked for that function as: 1. some users were not happy about the clash detection and they iterate params to find the correct parameter. 2. we need it in `dry-run` to list all params. Lukáš >> Thanks. >> - Ademar >> >
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
