Hi Cleber, On 3/2/21 6:36 PM, Cleber Rosa wrote: > On Tue, Feb 16, 2021 at 01:30:09PM +0200, Plamen Dimitrov wrote: >> I am confused about the release process of Avocado VT. First we had an email >> thread >> about whether we should provide version tags in sync between Avocado and >> Avocado VT. >> We didn't make any final conclusions on what was the final decision there so >> the release >> of Avocado VT 83.0 signaled me that we will continue following the previous >> workflow. >> Then however, there was never a release for Avocado VT 84.0 which meant we >> had decided >> to drop and the conclusion was not to release the VT plugin in sync with the >> core, the >> conclusion in the emails remaining unexplained again. Now I see that there >> is again a >> tag for Avocado VT 85.0, suggesting that we keep the versions in sync again. >> > Yes, you should be confused because I made a mistake and forgot to tag > and release Avocado-VT 83.0. It was during the holidays, and I got > cut off during Avocado and Avocado-VT release work.
I think what you mean to say here is about Avocado VT 84.0. It is also the missing tag as I described above with "there was never a release for Avocado VT 84.0". >> Is the missing 83.0 tag an error in the Avocado VT release process? Or is it >> intentional >> and there is another decision about the releases many of us are still >> unaware of? What >> would you state as a conclusion on the email thread about dropping VT from >> the Avocado >> releases? >> > I guess you mean 84.0 (83.0 is tagged). So, it was not intentional, it was a > mistake, > and the goal is to continue to have releases at the same time. Yes, sorry my bad here, I mislead you here which is probably what confused you above too. In any case, I have created an issue at https://github.com/avocado-framework/avocado-vt/issues/2937 because we need to release in order to be able to release our plugin as well. More details described within the issue. >> Best, >> Plamen >> > Let me know if that answers all of your questions. And I'm sorry > about the impact this has caused. Yes, it makes things clearer. I think additional confusion arose exactly because we also discussed whether to drop these tags or not before. Thanks for explaining this, Plamen
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
