26.05.2011, 21:02, "Geoffrey Hutchison" <[email protected]>: >> It needs to be implemented but I don't see any difficulties. Will look on >> it when I have some free time. > > Great, thanks! > >> However there may be some troubles with supporting this feature for both >> atoms and bonds (what should be done for "mixed" selection?) > > I think for most people, they care about the atoms rather than bonds in a > "mixed" selection. I guess the best solution would be a dialog with tabs for > atoms or bonds, but that's probably better left as a ToDo for now.
https://github.com/annulen/avogadro/commit/a69c045f2f1a192b166a954472dc15d4535c06fd Probably it should be further polished to reduce code duplication Also, maybe it's a good time to fix custom property manipulations. * We discussed use of QProperties to reduce memory overhead * I don't like how access to colors is implemented - first I need to check custom color, than color map, but it would be much more pleasant to have something like Atom::color() returning actual property value. -- Regards, Konstantin ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ vRanger cuts backup time in half-while increasing security. With the market-leading solution for virtual backup and recovery, you get blazing-fast, flexible, and affordable data protection. Download your free trial now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/quest-d2dcopy1 _______________________________________________ Avogadro-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/avogadro-devel
