Hi all

I posted a question at the NWChem forum 
(http://www.nwchem-sw.org/index.php/Special:AWCforum/st/id644/Do_I_have_an_imaginary_frequency....html),
 
and they suggested I get in touch with the Avogadro developers.

In a B3LYP/cc-pvtz frequency calculation, the log file lists:

  ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
  Normal Eigenvalue ||    Projected Derivative Dipole Moments (debye/angs)
   Mode   [cm**-1]  ||      [d/dqX]             [d/dqY] [d/dqZ]
  ------ ---------- || ------------------ ------------------ 
-----------------
     1      -32.993 ||       0.001               0.000 -0.009
     2        0.000 ||      -0.001               0.002 0.012
     3        0.000 ||       0.000              -0.023 0.001
     4        0.000 ||       0.000               0.009 0.001
     5        0.000 ||      -0.001              -0.003 0.017
     6        0.000 ||       0.000               0.011 0.001
     7        0.000 ||       0.006               0.000 -0.074
     8       56.848 ||       0.000               0.000 0.000
     9       77.476 ||      -0.030              -0.001 0.393
    10      116.618 ||      -0.244              -0.001 -0.019
    11      154.375 ||       0.000               0.000 0.000
    12      250.918 ||      -0.001               0.387 0.002

When I try to visualize the file in Avogadro, it does not show me this 
-32.99 cm-1 imaginary vibration. Is this expected behavior?

Thanks and regards.

-- 
Andrew Yeung
Donald J. Darensbourg Research Group
Department of Chemistry, Texas A&M University
3255 TAMU
College Station, TX 77843-3255

Tel: 979 845 4837
Fax: 979 845 0158


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Everyone hates slow websites. So do we.
Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics
Download AppDynamics Lite for free today:
http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_d2d_nov
_______________________________________________
Avogadro-Discuss mailing list
Avogadro-Discuss@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/avogadro-discuss

Reply via email to