As Weddington, Eric wrote: > > The STK500 could support that chip, but nobody had enough > > motivation so far to add support to AVRDUDE for that.
> But then we'd have to change the name to AVR8051DUDE, or > 8051AVRDUDE, or 80AVR51DUDE, or somesuch. Totally unwieldly in the > mouth. :-) Well, as that's about the only on-AVR chip supported by the STK500 (for hysterical raisins), if someone was really eager to contribute the code, I think I'd accept it. There's a good guarantee this doesn't proliferate anyway. ;-) (I guess adding Xmega support is overall more work than adding AT89S5x support...) > But if we then also add support for ARM, and AVR32, it becomes > generic enough we could just simply call it DUDE. Very > surfer/California-ish kinda thing. Certain zen quality to it. Yeah, > like, y'know? Hey, the irony detector here just triggered. Was that your posting that might have triggered it, Eric? :-) -- cheers, J"org .-.-. --... ...-- -.. . DL8DTL http://www.sax.de/~joerg/ NIC: JW11-RIPE Never trust an operating system you don't have sources for. ;-) _______________________________________________ AVR-chat mailing list AVR-chat@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/avr-chat
