On Wed, 2007-02-28 at 23:57 +0100, Joerg Wunsch wrote: > I don't mind, as long as it's really "live". I know the Wiki from > www.mikrocontroller.net is, but that's German only.
Which is great for German speakers, but overall it alienates more than 95% of people. > So far, the best > international resource is still avrfreaks.net, but they don't have a > Wiki. Maybe we should convince them of introducing one? But that > could become hard, as I can imagine Atmel (as the company hosting the > service) wouldn't want to be held responsible for the contents when > anyone on earth could modify that contents. Atmel are legally exposed, so one could understand their reluctance. > So it's simply the other way 'round: as soon as www.avrwiki.com offers > enough value/contents that people find it worth the while, it could > deserve a link on the avr-libc pages. I realize that's some kind of > barrier or critical mass situation, but it certainly doesn't make much > sense to place links to something that could eventually perhaps maybe > become a reasonable resource of knowledge some day. It's more of a 'chicken and egg' situation. It's not going to get populated till it's publicised, and waiting till it gets populated before publicising will ensure it will never get populated. I could suggest writing on the AVR main page something like: "AVR/GCC users/developers are strongly encouraged to share their knowledge on the <a href="http://www.avrwiki.com/avr-gcc">AVR wiki</a>". It would only take a main page with category links to stub pages before some people will actually start populating it. For example, I've just had some success debugging my asm/C code on linux with the graphical ddd debugger, which happens to work seamlessly with gdb-avr and simulavr, and I would happily write a page on that. Cheers David _______________________________________________ AVR-GCC-list mailing list AVR-GCC-list@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/avr-gcc-list