Weddington, Eric schrieb:
-----Original Message-----
From:
avr-gcc-list-bounces+eweddington=cso.atmel....@nongnu.org
[mailto:avr-gcc-list-bounces+eweddington=cso.atmel....@nongnu.
org] On Behalf Of Georg-Johann Lay
Sent: Saturday, February 28, 2009 9:00 AM
To: Nicholas Vinen
Cc: avr-gcc-list@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [avr-gcc-list] Re: C vs. assembly performance
Note that this may partially be covered by report 145284
(which I cannot
find, maybe Eric has closed/removed it)
Sorry, my mistake. I wrote the patch because I saw gcc 4 making bad code
(campared with 3.4.6) and read some bad-optimization reports that
address the subject on similar code.
It was not initiated by a specific report. However, several bug reports
on "performance regression" will be fixed/get some release by that patch.
> I'm sorry, but on which project?
BTW, is there a reason why there is more than one bug list? I saw a
third, but cannot find it again (maybe just a view on the sourceforge list).
http://www.nongnu.org/avr-libc/bugs.html
http://sourceforge.net/tracker2/?group_id=68108&atid=520074
Georg-Johann
_______________________________________________
AVR-GCC-list mailing list
AVR-GCC-list@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/avr-gcc-list
