> > (The compiler would even be allowed to optimize the sprintf() case, > > but by now, it doesn't do that.) > > Is it possible for a compiler to be *too* good, if it > generates optimal code despite terrible source?
Not according to many of the whiner... Errr.... *users* that post regularly on this mail list, AVR Freaks, etc. I've been waiting for almost 40 years for a compiler/interpreter that would do what I *meant* instead of what I *programmed*! :D Best regards, Stu Bell DataPlay (DPHI, Inc.) _______________________________________________ AVR-GCC-list mailing list AVR-GCC-list@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/avr-gcc-list
