FYI 4.5 head gives this result:
Target is avr-unknown-none
Host is i686-pc-linux-gnu
=== gcc Summary ===
# of expected passes 49145
# of unexpected failures 167
# of unexpected successes 12
# of expected failures 99
# of unresolved testcases 39
# of untested testcases 8
# of unsupported tests 1806
Weddington, Eric wrote:
-----Original Message-----
From:
avr-gcc-list-bounces+eric.weddington=atmel....@nongnu.org
[mailto:avr-gcc-list-bounces+eric.weddington=atmel....@nongnu.
org] On Behalf Of Boyapati, Anitha
Sent: Tuesday, October 27, 2009 2:47 AM
To: Andy H
Cc: avr-gcc-list@nongnu.org
Subject: RE: [avr-gcc-list] AVR atmega128 GCC 4.3.3
Testresults comparision
Try the files and simulator craeted as part of WINAVR
http://winavr.cvs.sourceforge.net/viewvc/winavr/avrtest/
Edit some paths to match your filespace.
Thanks Andy. I think avrtest worked much better. I managed to
get 42K passes!
=== gcc Summary ===
# of expected passes 42504
# of unexpected failures 711
# of unexpected successes 3
# of expected failures 91
# of unresolved testcases 428
# of untested testcases 564
# of unsupported tests 1229
/home/avr32/avr8/gcc-4.3.3/obj-var/gcc/xgcc version 4.3.3 (GCC)
Excellent!
I am still interested to know what went wrong with simulavr.
Simulavr, or at least the newer versions from the 'simulavrxx' code base, is
still newer and I don't think it's ever been used for running the regression
test suite. And this shows to me that simulavr is not quite ready for that.
_______________________________________________
AVR-GCC-list mailing list
AVR-GCC-list@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/avr-gcc-list
_______________________________________________
AVR-GCC-list mailing list
AVR-GCC-list@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/avr-gcc-list
