Boyapati, Anitha schrieb: >> I am completely in line with Eric: Your debugger will have to get smarter >> and not the compiler get dumb again. >> >> Johann > > As it was put, it is more of a performance question than about the > correctness of it. I am not sure what exactly the issue is, but you are > right that one cannot rely on rcall/ret matching sequences.
You mean the performance of the *debugger* ??? Shouldn't be an issue as the code just has to be scanned once (statically). > At first glance it appeared that the although we are achieving both > performance and size gain using rcall for stack allocation, the code looked > very misleading. Optimized code is to perform nicely, not to win beauty contest ;-) Johann > > Anitha > _______________________________________________ AVR-GCC-list mailing list AVR-GCC-list@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/avr-gcc-list
