>So then the binutily have to be fixed. avr-gcc already relies on relaxation.
Are you saying that I can't use avr-gcc WITHOUT using -relax on avr-ld? Then avr-gcc or directly avr-ld should at least warn about it, or even better, force it. Nevertheless, I don't think that's a good idea. The linker relaxations are complex, involve several mutually not always related operations, and users may have reasons why they don't want to use them. >You have a description of the bug? Just saw a rather lengthy chat on freaks >without pointing to the very problem... Actually, the *pointers* were given several times, e.g. in http://www.avrfreaks.net/index.php?name=PNphpBB2&file=viewtopic&p=849597#849597 ;-) There are two independent bugs. One is, that the trampolines without relax are broken. http://www.avrfreaks.net/index.php?name=PNphpBB2&file=viewtopic&p=707285#707285 Second is a genuine -relax bug. http://www.avrfreaks.net/index.php?name=PNphpBB2&file=viewtopic&p=764532#764532 And I have already been preached by Joerg for not submitting it to the linker tracker, thank you. :-) >> That sounds for me like a superior solution [...] > [...] 24-bit pointers [...] I did not realize that. I take the above back. JW _______________________________________________ AVR-GCC-list mailing list AVR-GCC-list@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/avr-gcc-list
