> -----Original Message----- > From: Georg-Johann Lay [mailto:a...@gjlay.de] > Sent: Monday, January 30, 2012 4:34 AM > To: Weddington, Eric > Cc: Bill Westfield; avr-gcc-list@nongnu.org > Subject: Re: [avr-gcc-list] Weird optimization issue with avr-gcc 4.5.3, re > "naked." > > Weddington, Eric wrote: > > The main function should still be set up as a "OS_main" function, i.e. > > it doesn't return anywhere. > > From how I understand OS_main and from the sources, there is nothing that adds > noreturn semantics to OS_main. It's the same as OS_task except that OS_main > assumes that IRQs are off. In particular, OS_main functions will have an > epilogue.
Oh, my apologies then. It's been a while since I looked as OS_main and I mistakenly thought it did that. _______________________________________________ AVR-GCC-list mailing list AVR-GCC-list@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/avr-gcc-list
