On 09.08.12 16:05, David Brown wrote: > For what it's worth, I too dislike the newer AVR Studio - partly > because I do most of my development work with Linux, and partly > because even on Windows it is a bloated mess. I can't figure out why > they decided to use MS VS as a base - the industry has practically > standardised on Eclipse, and the single biggest request from users > for AVR Studio 5 was that it be cross-platform. But I guess Atmel > had their reasons, and they are certainly good at making the compiler > toolchain easily available from Linux, so I don't want to complain > /too/ much.
Quite a few people like Eclipse - I pretty much only hear good things about it. But I'm too old to change my text hacking mindset from text based toolsets - and I'm welded onto the gnu toolchain, across a number of target platforms, having used it exclusively in the latter half of a quarter century of embedded development. (ctags and a few bits and pieces give me enough of Eclipse's bells and whistles to keep me happy.) So long as that's convenient on linux, I'll continue to use AVRs. Erik -- One man's constant is another man's variable. - A.J. Perli _______________________________________________ AVR-GCC-list mailing list AVR-GCC-list@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/avr-gcc-list