As Eric said, we are working towards upstreaming all the patches and the header files. It should happen soon as it is under verification now.
VP ________________________________________ From: avr-gcc-list-bounces+vidhya.praveen=atmel....@nongnu.org [avr-gcc-list-bounces+vidhya.praveen=atmel....@nongnu.org] on behalf of Joerg Wunsch [j...@uriah.heep.sax.de] Sent: Tuesday, October 16, 2012 11:47 AM To: avr-gcc-list@nongnu.org Subject: Re: [avr-gcc-list] Porting Atmel patches Georg-Johann Lay <a...@gjlay.de> wrote: > Notice you must have passed the paperwork. Well, don't you think that adding support for a new AVR device would consist a simple change that doesn't require the full paperwork? I think it's always a good idea for a potential contributor to file the paperwork, but for a change like this one, I don't see a reason to hold it back until the copyright assignment has been fully handled by FSF (which could take its time, as you know ...). -- cheers, J"org .-.-. --... ...-- -.. . DL8DTL http://www.sax.de/~joerg/ NIC: JW11-RIPE Never trust an operating system you don't have sources for. ;-) _______________________________________________ AVR-GCC-list mailing list AVR-GCC-list@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/avr-gcc-list _______________________________________________ AVR-GCC-list mailing list AVR-GCC-list@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/avr-gcc-list
