I notice that GCC's documentation [1] says "Only basic asm statements can safely be included in naked functions (see Basic Asm). While using extended asm or a mixture of basic asm and C code may appear to work, they cannot be depended upon to work reliably and are not supported." However, a lot of our example code contains naked functions with C code, such as [2], [3], and [4], as well as indirectly via ISR_NAKED, such as [5] and [6]. Is there a reason that GCC's documentation doesn't apply to us here, or is it only by sheer luck that none of these have resulted in problems in practice?
[1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/AVR-Function-Attributes.html [2] http://www.nongnu.org/avr-libc/user-manual/mem_sections.html#c_sections [3] http://www.nongnu.org/avr-libc/user-manual/FAQ.html#faq_softreset [4] http://www.nongnu.org/avr-libc/user-manual/group__avr__watchdog.html#details [5] http://www.nongnu.org/avr-libc/user-manual/group__avr__time.html#ga15aea81a8985a4c3cc9c8b00a06f5d31 [6] http://www.nongnu.org/avr-libc/user-manual/group__avr__interrupts.html#attr_interrupt _______________________________________________ AVR-GCC-list mailing list AVR-GCC-list@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/avr-gcc-list
