As E. Weddington wrote: > >ATmega16 datashet (2466K?AVR?04/05) on page 342: > > > >Changes from Rev. > >2466E-10/02 to Rev. > >2466F-02/03 > > > >... > >8. Removed ADHSM completely. > >...
> Thanks, Anatoly! Btw., I've asked [EMAIL PROTECTED] for the reasoning behind that. They replied to me, but so far did not respond to my request for permission to quote their reply verbatim here. So in my own words, that bit was once meant to feed additional power into the analog comparator so it would get faster, but they eventually noticed the comparator was even fast enough without that measure. In effect, the ADHSM bit turned into a ``burn more power'' bit only, so they withdrew it. According to their reply, the presence of that bit in the current AT90CAN128 docs is a mistake, and scheduled for removal as well. In that light, I think we should change our header files to remove the bit as well, so any attempt to still use it will point the people onto it by a due compiler error. The removal should IMHO be done by commenting it out and stating the reason, so everybody gets a clear idea that he really doesn't want that bit anymore at all. -- cheers, J"org .-.-. --... ...-- -.. . DL8DTL http://www.sax.de/~joerg/ NIC: JW11-RIPE Never trust an operating system you don't have sources for. ;-) _______________________________________________ AVR-libc-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/avr-libc-dev
