On Thursday 15 February 2007 16:29, Dmitry K. wrote: > On Thursday 15 February 2007 16:05, Joerg Wunsch wrote: > > As Dmitry K. wrote: > > > One point is required: to increase the size of the buffer > > > for float point numbers in vfprintf.c (FLOAT version), as > > > the range of numbers became wider: up to ~1e-45. I did not > > > hasten to make this change because I debug now the improved > > > variant of vfprintf() function which integrates all olds > > > patches. [...] > OK, I will increase buffer size at the nearest time to obtain > a safe state of CVS.
Unfortunately, the simple increase in the buffer has not given result. Having spent there is some time, I have decided to leave vfprintf.c while without changes. It is not necessary to consider this mistake blocking, it does not destroy a stack of the program. After the termination of testing I shall update function. There the conclusion of numbers with a floating point at all does not use greater buffers. Dmitry. _______________________________________________ AVR-libc-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/avr-libc-dev
