As Steve Franks wrote: > >It has a point, but it's not very exact either: it suggests > >__malloc_heap_end were a pointer which it isn't.
> >You did earlier say 'it's a variable that points to heap_end', > however. Hence the confusion, I think? You are right, of course, the variable *is* a pointer. Sorry. Too many levels of indirection for my brain. ;-) -- cheers, J"org .-.-. --... ...-- -.. . DL8DTL http://www.sax.de/~joerg/ NIC: JW11-RIPE Never trust an operating system you don't have sources for. ;-) _______________________________________________ AVR-libc-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/avr-libc-dev
