As Eric Weddington wrote: > ../MicroTransTempReg.c:153: warning: passing argument 1 of > 'eeprom_write_word' discards qualifiers from pointer target type
> I removed the "const" declaration and this removed the warning > message. However, Jörg suggested to file a a bug report." The bug report was merely meant to be a reminder to go over <avr/eeprom.h> once again to look for any missing consts. I think my idea was that the second arg to eeprom_write_word() could be declared const, but well, upon thinking more about it, it's not a pointer so there's not much sense in that. All of the eeprom_read_*() functions do have their pointers correctly declared. So yes, this can be closed as invalid I think. -- cheers, J"org .-.-. --... ...-- -.. . DL8DTL http://www.sax.de/~joerg/ NIC: JW11-RIPE Never trust an operating system you don't have sources for. ;-) _______________________________________________ AVR-libc-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/avr-libc-dev
