As Chris Spencer wrote: > Running "latex -version" gives me: > pdfeTeX 3.141592-1.21a-2.2 (Web2C 7.5.4) > kpathsea version 3.5.4
That's exactly what I get here, but I think it's also what I used to get with the older LaTeX version. > Why does avr-libc even need latex? Is it just for documentation? Obviously, yes. > Can it be disabled? It's even disabled by default, but it appears the RPM spec file does enable it to also get the documentation build (similar to the FreeBSD ports version that also wants to have documentation). The main question is why doxygen's output is suddenly incompatible with LaTeX. That's not supposed to happen. It's also a bit strange that the latex command doesn't write any complaint to stderr, it just exits with status 1. Ah, yes, another reason might be not a LaTeX but a doxygen upgrade. -- cheers, J"org .-.-. --... ...-- -.. . DL8DTL http://www.sax.de/~joerg/ NIC: JW11-RIPE Never trust an operating system you don't have sources for. ;-) _______________________________________________ AVR-libc-dev mailing list AVR-libc-dev@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/avr-libc-dev
