We've been shipping documentation as HTML, Postscript, and PDF for quite some years now. As compiling the intermediate LaTeX code into PS and PDF requires different settings, this causes two runs of doxygen to build the documentation.
I wonder whether people do actually value the PS version at all, or if we could simply drop it from the build as anyone who wants a printed manual could always print the PDF version instead (which gives a similarly high-quality print as PS does). Opinions? -- cheers, J"org .-.-. --... ...-- -.. . DL8DTL http://www.sax.de/~joerg/ NIC: JW11-RIPE Never trust an operating system you don't have sources for. ;-) _______________________________________________ AVR-libc-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/avr-libc-dev
