As Eric Weddington wrote:

> Currently, some devices are opitimized for "speed" in
> devtools/gen-avr-lib-tree.sh. I'd like to change the current setup
> to optimize for space for all devices. See attached patch.

The question is whether distinguishing CFLAGS_SPACE and CFLAGS_SPEED
still makes any sense at all then.

Just curious, did you compare the resulting codesizes for the
different -O levels?  My last comparison is a bit dated now, and
it's quite possible something else (like -O1 or -O2) might make
more sense with the current compiler(s).

-- 
cheers, J"org               .-.-.   --... ...--   -.. .  DL8DTL

http://www.sax.de/~joerg/                        NIC: JW11-RIPE
Never trust an operating system you don't have sources for. ;-)


_______________________________________________
AVR-libc-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/avr-libc-dev

Reply via email to